AppsTech Prysme

Others help you write.
Prysme scores the draft before the evaluator does.

Responsive, Loopio and AutogenAI help you draft from approved content. So does Prysme. Then it puts the finished draft in front of a panel of AI evaluators, who score it against the call's own criteria the way the buyer or funder will.

The free trial lasts 14 days, with no credit card required.

A review by a reviewer built from the call's scoring grid, with its checks
Actual application screen · Demo data
22reviewer profiles for the AI evaluation panel
1click to build a reviewer from the call's scoring grid
4checks run by every reviewer on every draft
2languages, each edition drafted as an original
Before you submit

A final review before you submit.

Your team reviews each section. Before the proposal goes out, a panel of AI evaluators reads the whole draft the way the buyer or funder will. Each one scores it against the call's own evaluation criteria and weights, as Prysme read them from the call, and against the criteria of their profile.

01
Twenty-two reviewer profiles, or your own.

The profiles include a buyer's IT director, a buyer's CFO, an information security assessor, a public procurement evaluator, an EU grant evaluator and a community foundation program officer. A reviewer can also be built from the call in one click: the call's scoring grid and its weights become the reviewer's criteria.

02
Scored against the call.

Each reviewer scores every criterion, gives a verdict, lists strengths and weaknesses, ranks the fixes by priority and asks the questions you are likely to face. Each fix quotes the passage concerned and names its section. Every reviewer also runs four checks: figures with no visible source, win themes not tied to a scoring criterion, results that restate the activities, and a budget narrative that differs from the budget table or the work plan.

03
You choose the fixes.

Your team ticks the fixes it accepts, and Prysme redrafts the sections concerned from your own sources. When a fix needs a figure your sources do not contain, Prysme asks you for it. A section edited by hand is redrafted with your agreement. A second run of the panel shows the new scores.

The reviewer panel at work

A reviewer built from the funder’s call, in 46 seconds.

Prysme reads the scoring grid in the call, builds a reviewer from it and scores the draft against each criterion. The recording has no sound and carries captions.

Actual application screens · Demo data
Samples

A review produced with Prysme, from demo data.

The organization, call and figures in this sample are fictional.

Side by side

Nine for nine.

Prysme against Responsive, Loopio and AutogenAI, feature by feature, from each company's own website.

YesIn partNot described on its website
FeaturePrysme9/9Responsive0/91 in partLoopio0/91 in partAutogenAI1/91 in part
A panel of AI evaluators scores the finished draft against the call's criteriaYesScore per criterion, verdict, strengths and weaknessesNot described on its websiteNot described on its website"Confidence Pulse" rates each answer for accuracy and completenessIn partDrafts written to the scoring criteria; "Gamma Review" checks
A reviewer built from the call's own scoring grid, in one clickYesThe grid and its weights become the criteriaNot described on its websiteNot described on its websiteNot described on its website
22 evaluator profiles, from a buyer's CFO to an EU grant evaluatorYesNot described on its websiteNot described on its websiteNot described on its website
Priority fixes, and the questions the evaluator is likely to askYesEach fix quotes the passage and names its sectionNot described on its websiteNot described on its websiteNot described on its website
Reports to funders on the grants you winYesInterim, annual and final, in every planNot described on its websiteNot described on its websiteNot described on its website
English and French, each edition drafted as an originalYesNot described on its websiteIn partMulti-language library; project translations as an add-onYesMultilingual generation
Prices published on the websiteYesFrom $149 a month, for the whole teamIn partFrom $10,000; other editions through salesNot described on its websiteCustom quoteNot described on its website
Free trial, no credit card requiredYes14 daysNot described on its websiteContact salesNot described on its websiteA call with salesNot described on its websiteBook a demo
Nonprofit rateYes30% less on every planNot described on its websiteNot described on its websiteNot described on its website

Information from each company's website on October 2, 2026; their offers may have changed since.

Sources: responsive.io/pricing, responsive.io · loopio.com/pricing, loopio.com, loopio.com/blog/best-ai-software-rfp-responses · autogenai.com, autogenai.com/blog/autogenai-vs-responsive-for-proposal-teams. Responsive, Loopio and AutogenAI are trademarks of their respective owners.

A fourteen-day free trial.

The trial includes three team members, ten active proposals and 1,000 AI credits, with no credit card required. The first sections can be drafted from an RFP you are working on now, once it is uploaded and your company profile is filled in.

Start a free trial

For a guided tour, request a demo →

AppsTech Prysme, Proposal Intelligence